Thank you so, so much to everyone who participated in this thread. Your insights were incredibly helpful, naturally, they cemented my own experiences as a much more widely shared experience. More importantly, they brought nuance to these challenges based on your individual circumstances.
I promised I would feedback, so here’s what came out of the event, and my follow up actions so far.
I participated in a round table discussion on Women in Exports, having been invited by the Chartered Institute of Export and International Trade. The event was hosted by Alison Griffiths MP at the House of Commons with 14 representatives from variety business and export backgrounds. Also in attendance were Marco Forgione, Director General of the Institute, and Tim Reid, Chief Executive of UK Export Finance.
LinkedIn post from the Institute
The discussions were earnest and the goal laudable - to support women-led small businesses to export more.
However, quite quickly, it became abundantly clear that the needs of micro-businesses, such as ours, would be completely ignored in this goal and support would be withheld from those who cannot grow without it.
Previous empirical and quantitative research indicates that women are disproportionately represented within this sector, and therefore, will be disproportionately affected by the recent exporting challenges brought by GPSR and US tariffs.
Etsy’s 2024 Seller Census – UK Sellers, pages 10-14
The Crafts Council Makers Survey: published in March 2025
Earlier this month, a new package was announced giving UK Export Finance (UKEF) the power to expand financing support for British businesses by £20 billion, with small businesses also able to access loans of up to £2 million through the British Business Bank’s Growth Guarantee Scheme.
This was proudly referred to in Tim Reid’s speech at the event. However, the only businesses that will be able to apply for this support, will be those registered with Companies House.
No sole-traders will be eligible in any capacity.
In the spirit of support and potential collaboration, I shared details of the Etsy and Crafts Council reports with representatives of both the Institute and UKEF at the event. (I further emailed them to my contact at the Institute on Thursday)
The core reason that women-led micro-businesses will be excluded from ANY action taken by these organisations is because we are invisible.
There is no “official” record that we exist, let alone acknowledgment of the value that we bring to our local economies and communities, or to society as a whole.
- There is NO data to identify the number of businesses who do not meet the Government’s definition of “small” and should therefore be classed as micro-businesses.
- There is NO data, other than Companies House records, to identify women-led businesses.
- The UKEF admit that to date, they cannot accurately state how many women-led businesses they have supported in the past.
With no benchmark data, this is a massive knowledge gap. Unless that is filled, it is impossible to set goals, targets, or KPIs for activity.
There is simply no way to make any meaningful assessment of the current situation and what action will be beneficial or measurable in the future.
I have recommended that both the Institute and UKEF contact with a number of leading figures and organisations in the craft/design/creative business sphere.
I did so in the hope that through their shared goals, opportunities for collaboration, learning and support may arise.
These include:
- The Crafts Council
- The Design Trust
- Make it British – representing not just brands but manufacturers
- Holly Tucker MBE
- UK based marketplaces for crafts (hosting UK sellers exclusively) i.e. Folksy!
A key challenge that was raised by other attendees was the fear of a “lost generation” of potential exporters.
It was widely acknowledged that the regulatory landscape is now so challenging that many businesses, of all sizes, simply do not even attempt it.
This means a lack of in-house knowledge around exporting processes, and an overall decrease in confidence to commit to this form of business growth.
This fear highlights not just how valuable our efforts as low-level exporters can be, but also how easy it would be to support us much more effectively.
- Our needs are far more basic in terms of the knowledge needed.
- The low cost of provide financing to help us restart exporting, as we did before.
- The benefits for businesses who wish to use exporting as a way to grow their businesses.
My apologies if this update is a bit “report” like – to save time, I have amalgamated a number of the follow up emails that I have sent since the event.
I fully appreciate that the overall tone of this update is somewhat negative, however I am optimistic that we are now less invisible than we were previously.
The fact that the solutions we require are relatively straight forward, and low cost, gives me hope that they may emerge at some point.
My contact at the Institute has told me that they are already working on some tools and I have offered to be a tester. When I can share anything further about these developments – I will!
These solutions would not only offer support to our sector, but other micro-businesses within the broader ecommerce sector and potentially beyond.
Individually, we may be tiny, but collectively, we are many!